I just planned a flight from KSFO-EDDF using your 747-400 PW4056 profile with a M.84 cruise, but I noticed in the OFP printout that the TAS at F元90 remained constant at 482 knots although the temperature deviations at this cruise altitude ranged from ISA+15 to ISA-1 so there should have been some variation in TAS (typically 1k change per 1 degree deviation from ISA). However, I have a question: do your profiles adjust for non-ISA conditions? Many thanks for the very detailed additional aircraft profiles for PFPX, especially the latest ones for the 747-400. That's why I share my profiles as widely as I can, so people can examine them very closely. It's the credit to people who think the same way as I do and are interested in improvement of the atmosphere in FS.Īs I said earlier, I am open for any help and cooperation. Just because I do it so carefully as I usually do it for myself.įirst of all, I have not only documentation (still, loads of it too though), but some data more that allows me to do the job. I am certain about my work and its results. That's why I share my profiles as widely as I can, so people can examine them very closely and give fair feedback. I do these profiles as a voluntary job and I am up to help all people who are interested in the improvement.Īs I said earlier, I am open for any help and cooperation. I don't need an insertion of my profiles into the programme. But the performance data is very precise, I daresay even for real life. Renaming the headers gives users an opportunity to add the required aircraft types and specifications separately (pax and cargo), different thrust ratings on 737CL and NG families etc. Some types are absolutely identical, but in real life some of them are as well. It's the credit to people who think the same way as I do and are interested in improvement of the atmosphere in FS. Let me explain my position.įirst of all, I have not only documentation (though loads of it too), but some data more that allows me to do the job.

Pfpx aircraft templates